Military Security and Politics in Regime Change

Regime change, the replacement of one regime by another, is a complex and multifaceted process often involving a significant role for the military. The military's involvement in regime change can be multifaceted, ranging from providing security to suppressing opposition to actively participating in the overthrow of the existing regime. This article explores the interplay between military security and politics in regime change, examining the complex power dynamics and the influence of external factors.

The military is often seen as the guarantor of national security, tasked with protecting the state and its citizens from external and internal threats. In many countries, the military plays a significant role in maintaining internal order and stability, particularly during times of political turmoil or transition.

During regime change, the military's role in ensuring security is critical. The military can provide security for the new regime, protecting it from potential threats and ensuring stability during the transition period. However, the military's involvement can also be a source of tension and conflict, particularly if it is perceived as favoring one side or suppressing opposition.

The Power Triangle: Military, Security, and Politics in Regime Change

by John Brenkman

4.5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	2035 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	424 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

FREE

Regime change is inherently political, involving shifts in power and the reconfiguration of political institutions. The military's involvement in regime change is often intertwined with political considerations, as the military may be aligned with particular political factions or ideologies.

The military's political role in regime change can vary considerably. In some cases, the military may act as a neutral arbiter, facilitating a peaceful transition of power. In other cases, the military may actively participate in the overthrow of an existing regime, either through a coup d'état or by supporting opposition forces.

The military's involvement in regime change is often influenced by the distribution of power within the state. In states with strong military institutions, the military may have a significant degree of autonomy and influence over political decision-making. This can lead to situations where the military plays a dominant role in regime change, either by dictating the terms of the transition or even seizing power itself.

Conversely, in states with weak military institutions, the military's role in regime change may be more limited. In such cases, the military may be more likely to subordinate itself to civilian authority or to align with other political actors, such as political parties or social movements.

Regime change is often influenced by external factors, including geopolitical interests, economic pressures, and international organizations. External actors may provide support or opposition to regime change, depending on their interests and perceptions.

External support for regime change can come in various forms, including military intervention, economic sanctions, or diplomatic pressure. External opposition to regime change may also take various forms, including condemnation, withholding recognition, or even military action.

To illustrate the complex interplay between military security and politics in regime change, consider the following case studies:

Chile (1973): The Chilean military played a central role in overthrowing the democratically elected government of Salvador Allende, installing a military dictatorship that lasted for 17 years. The military's involvement was motivated by a combination of security concerns and political opposition to Allende's socialist policies.

Egypt (2011): The Egyptian military played a significant role in the 2011 revolution that led to the overthrow of President Hosni Mubarak. The military initially intervened to quell the protests but later sided with the opposition, providing security and facilitating the transition to a civilian government.

Burkina Faso (2014): The Burkinabé military played a leading role in overthrowing President Blaise Compaoré, who had been in power for 27 years. The military's involvement was motivated by public anger over Compaoré's attempt to extend his term limits, as well as concerns about corruption and economic mismanagement.

The role of military security and politics in regime change is complex and multifaceted, varying across different countries and contexts. The military's involvement can be a source of stability and security during times of political transition, but it can also lead to conflict and repression. The political dynamics, power relationships, and external factors all shape the military's role in regime change, highlighting the intricate interplay between security and politics in this critical process.

Understanding the complex relationship between military security and politics in regime change is essential for developing effective strategies for promoting democratic transitions and ensuring stability in post-conflict societies. By considering the factors discussed in this article, policymakers, researchers, and practitioners can gain a deeper understanding of the military's role in regime change and develop more effective approaches to managing this complex process.

The Power Triangle: Military, Security, and Politics in Regime Change

by John Brenkman

4.5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	2035 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	424 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

FREE